Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25991365-20140922180400

I'm getting very tired of people just abusing the "remove reply" feature. I think it's really silly because now "Close thread" means nothing and people go around removing replies, providing it with even more comments and it just gets so stressful. I think we should have a rule on removing replies. I think users should only remove replies that are spam. Another thing as well. I saw one user trying to dodge the necroposting rule earlier by removing my reply in a year-old thread just to type a derogatory comment. That's the kind of behaviour that I'm talking about.

We don't even need to remove replies, because whatever the user has said still stands and is still seen by the person who removes the reply in the first place. The point being: I'd like to keep history going on this Wiki, instead of having to delete threads that turn into people removing replies to tack on extra words, despite the fact  the damm thing has been closed. Closing threads doesn't mean nothing any more, because more often that not I've seen replies removed and then extra comments are tacked on.

Even if we don't make this a rule, can we at least  removing replies and adding comments to them as necroposting? Because what exactly can the user do if they're insulted? Necropost again?  