Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5961377-20170311223417/@comment-30307603-20170318174529

Valer22 wrote: I'm surprised it wasn't done sooner, considering that this was discussed weeks ago. I remain supportive.

Well, the problem stems more from how we want rearrange it rather than if we're rearranging or not. The last thread ended with us briefly mentioning on whether we should order it from most recent design to earliest design with special designs last or whether we should order it from most recent design to oldest design to the next oldest design etc.

In addition, we still need to decide how we're going to divide the workload since this would be such a big change. The thread also exists to keep track of that.