Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5691231-20130814205004/@comment-5454761-20130816103623

OctagonDinosaur wrote: Mhm, I agree with everything. Sometimes having one buro can be a pain as they can make decisions without admins intervining, and they can make the decision with one snap of their fingers, which sometimes isn't totally fair. If we have two buros, matters can be dealt with even further, and more control can be dealt with across the wiki. I'm not saying that one buro is crap and isn't needed, I'm just summing up that two would be better and more efficient. This, Mister Jim wrote: I think it would be better to have a second opinion. Instead of just one person making the discussion with no other input. this and IEatsRainbowz wrote: I agree. Being a buro doesn't mean you own the wiki. Any/all changes should be asked for approval by the admins and the community. The wiki is everybody's. Good job on shedding light on this subject.