Thread:Randomced859/@comment-5588400-20130831171625/@comment-5691231-20130831180012

I'm going to have to agree with Rainbowz in this.

You had no duty to delete a blog post that was only for consensus of the wiki and nothing more. It was not a personal attack, or abuse. But what you're doing is considered both.

The wiki has all of its rights (with no limit) to create a blog post about a second bureaucrat. It does not matter if we've already created it before, the whole reason we decided on creating another was because it's been close to 2 weeks (now 3 weeks) and you still haven't done a thing.

The whole "assistant buro" or whatever it's called doesn't even exist. And it'd be useless to request it being installed because it's not what we want. We want someone with all the functions of a solid bureaucrat. I believe you're making way too big a deal out of this. All we want is a second bureaucrat and you're acting like the wiki is going to be terrorized.

It doesn't matter if you're busy with stuff in real life, if you were, then why would you have enough time to delete the blog but not enough time to promote? You're just hesitating because you obviously don't want another bureaucrat. Saying that this wiki had "cruel times" is no excuse either. If we're not trusted enough with these positions, then why are you? at least we wouldn't delete a perfectly good blog post about community agreement without everyone elses input.

Did you ask any of us other admins before you deleted that blog? No, you just took it upon yourself to do what you wanted to. That's selfish. We never even wanted your rights stripped to being with, but if you're not going to reason with anyone here in the wiki, then we may have to.