Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5961377-20150409133402/@comment-24773467-20150411054329

Yami Arashi wrote: Just gonna throw a different opinion in here. Although Stick has had a past of being demoted and misbehaving, he is still nevertheless an active, constructive editor. He's on nearly every day and does appear to watch the wiki activity. I honestly don't see anything wrong with giving him such small rights. Stick doesn't abuse his ability to undo edits, so how could he possibly abuse rollback? It's not like everybody will be looking up to a rollback user on how to handle situations, nor will they be asking one to handle most situations like deleting an image or renaming a page, etc. I don't see anything wrong with giving such a small amount of rights that he would be able to use well.

But that's my opinion.

I'd like to point out that regardless of the innocuousness of the position, behavior should well be standard for even being considered. I don't deem him capable of holding any such position with his active carelessness, bluntness, and overall stubbornness. Those such behavioral traits shouldn't be taken lightly for any promotion.

I am inclusive that his behavior is a major factor in my opposal for his promotion and I am not satisfied with handing down any such position to him.