Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4423426-20150409050128/@comment-9300845-20150409051419

At first I was rather indifferent toward rollbacks moderating, even though it annoyed me a little bit. I was unsure whether or not such actions were acceptable since rollbacks were (and still are) reliable and trustworthy.

But can rollbacks be technically considered moderators? They only have the right to undo several edits at once, plus access to sysop-locked pages, but no rights to take disciplinary actions (e.g. blocking user.) In a sense, they can sort of moderate edits made on articles, but virtually powerless in other areas.

So short answer: I concur with Klonoamiyumi.