Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5961377-20150409133402/@comment-4423426-20150409171356

I don't see the point in me arguing against this, even though I remember a while ago when he was demoted, I made a point that we always end up giving people we demote complimentary positions, as in-- we downgrade them to a lower position and then they wind up not using them at all, and we seem to only do it to keep them under control.

Well, it's been a while since then and he has shown noticeable improvement.

Even though, he may be the same, I have to admit he's been very good at not getting himself into arguments since then. What happened last night, was an exception. So far he's being doing alright, from what I have seen.

This is what prompted the discussion of rollback moderating on the other thread I made, because I'm worried he's only going to aqquire these rights just so he can start enforcing rules and everything, because we still don't expicitly know what rollbacks can and can't do. I still don't  believe he can enforce rules, so I'm hoping he wants this position to work on articles, and not just so he can get a position at all.