Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27820485-20170212210750/@comment-5961377-20170215123242

I must make the following points:

1. This is not unnecessary, actually. If one would look at our Manual of Style regarding character pages, there is no standard. We have been, so far, arbitrary regarding the ordering of the images. This is the first step.

2. Regarding the claim that the images were in chronological order: that is not completely true. Additions such as the prototype/early reel and the child versions of the character are out of place. In fact, they were usually last, when one would expect the early reel version to be first.

For this new standard, I agree with the proposal to simply have them in reverse chronological order, however, we should keep the "special" designs (prototypes, alternate forms) last.